- Table of Contents for: All in the family : the realignment of A?
- All in the Family: The Realignment of American Democracy Since the 1960s.
- Emergency Wild Bird Care [Article].
A good read and I highly recommend it. Pretty balanced account of social changes in the U. The theme of family and its redefinition during these years which coincided with my childhood and youth is novel and persuasive. View 2 comments. Oct 20, Laura marked it as to-read. Looks fascinating but i probably will never get through all pages.
Jan 25, Andee Nero rated it it was amazing. I told myself that I wouldn't get as angry reading this book as I did the first time, but nope. View 1 comment. Aug 06, Debbie Howarth rated it really liked it. Excellent analysis of the US political climate that explains the widespread support for the GOP agenda. As liberals moved to include the protected classes the conservatives became disenfranchised. Instead of closing the gap each party does its best to widen the gap.
By understanding the duality hopefully we can move past the divide to return to a United States. Mar 20, Chris Cook rated it liked it.
- Project MUSE - Race, Gender, and the Rise of Conservatism.
- All in the Family: The Realignment of American Democracy since the 1960s.
- Sozio-kulturelle Aspekte und ästhetische Gestaltung von Gabriel Garcia Marquez Cien años de soledad und Günter Grass Die Blechtrommel (German Edition);
- Pray for Our Nation;
This book was a bit long to get through, and it was breadth than depth about the subject matter--how breadwinner liberalism became breadwinner conservatism, and led to the development of the New Right in American politics--but I appreciated how he layered so many events in the narrative so that we could see the themes and motives he mentioned as they developed through the ss. Oct 11, John Kaufmann rated it really liked it Shelves: politics-economics , history. Excellent premise, with good supporting evidence. Self argues that the realignment of American politics from liberal to conservative over the past four decades was driven by challenges to gender and sexual roles and which vision predominated.
The book explores the various male and female roles, how traditional roles came under assault during the s, and the conservative counter-reaction. These roles, Self argues, are one of society's guiding mythologies, and shape how society is ordered. Rath Excellent premise, with good supporting evidence. Rather than being a sideshow, how the culture-war battles play out shape our broader politic landscape. From the New Deal through the Great Society, "breadwinner liberalism" which assisted families was the prevailing mythology.
In the s this vision came under challenge, mostly from the left itself.
Library Resource Finder: Table of Contents for: All in the family : the realignment of A
The s, driven by the Civil Rights movement, became more inclusive of different social groups and expanding individual rights. By the late s different versions of feminism and gay rights were on the agenda, challenging gender roles and sexuality. The questionable intent and execution of the Vietnam War challenged the myth that manhood is defined by soldiering. These forces threw the traditional versions of American manhood and womanhood into turmoil.
Most Popular Videos
Conservatives, of course, defended the traditional gender roles and sexuality. Their version of "breadwinner's conservatism" proposed to protect the American family and gender roles from moral harm. Liberals, as seen by conservatives, supported big government and promoted abortion, condoned broken families, and advocated equal rights for women and gays as well as blacks A return to traditional values required reducing the power of the federal government; families could flourish only if government stayed out of their way.
Breadwinners, in this mythology, are not dependent on the state for either welfare or rights. This aligned with conservative market-oriented policies. Sep 10, John Wetterholt rated it it was amazing Shelves: history. An exhaustively researched and generally engagingly written examination of the shifting sociopolitical attitudes in the United States from Kennedy through Clinton.
SIMILAR BOOKS SUGGESTED BY OUR CRITICS:
Professor Self is particularly adroit in describing the archetypes that politicians and pundits used in framing their rhetoric. As an outgrowth of the booming post-World War II society, the idea of "breadwinner liberalism" gained a strong foothold, canonizing the dynamic of Dad going to work while Mom stayed home to raise the children An exhaustively researched and generally engagingly written examination of the shifting sociopolitical attitudes in the United States from Kennedy through Clinton.
As an outgrowth of the booming post-World War II society, the idea of "breadwinner liberalism" gained a strong foothold, canonizing the dynamic of Dad going to work while Mom stayed home to raise the children.
While this scenario was never as pervasive as the "Leave It to Beaver" script writers would have us believe, it became an entrenched aspirational ideal for many citizens and policymakers in the s. The Civil Rights movement of the s and '60s, the push for greater positive rights protections for women and gays in the '60s and '70s, and the shifting economic focus of politicians in and out of power realigned the debate.
These protections were often characterized by those in resistance to them as pleas for special rights and threats to venerated ideals, when in point of fact these rights protections had historically been enjoyed only by a minority of the population white heterosexual men. A well-done work of political history. Jan 16, Dave Ciskowski rated it really liked it Shelves: donated-lost.
A solid and comprehensive review of US political history from through The book is an excellent overview and paints a full picture of how politics has evolved as Self casts it from breadwinner liberalism to breadwinner conservatism -- and how politics of other identities has both reacted to and shaped this arc. Self's "All in the Family" could help explain why. Self, a professor of history at Brown University, has heroically researched the history of the culture wars from the early s to the present.
He offers a provocative analysis that accounts for today's alliance between small-government and social conservatives, on the one hand, and welfare-state and social liberals, on the other. Self begins his history by describing "breadwinner liberalism" as the status quo of the early and mids. The architects of the Great Society assumed the primacy of male-earner and female-homemaker families.
All in the Family: The Realignment of American Democracy Since the 1960s
Labor unions fought for a family wage for their predominantly male membership, the Moynihan Report raised alarms about black male unemployment, and the first efforts at affirmative action took the form of quotas in municipal contracts for male construction workers. In all these cases "women were largely an afterthought," Mr. Self writes. Breadwinner liberalism, he argues, was based on a model of "masculine individualism": hardworking, striving, self-reliant.
By the late s, male breadwinners were beset from all sides. Their antiwar sons grew their hair long and scoffed at verities about masculine honor. Gays, going public early in the decade as self-defined "homophiles," challenged presumptions about masculine sexuality. Traditional men watched anxiously as their wives brought home paychecks and as women generally demanded relief from sexual harassment, low pay and pink-collar ghettos. Men soon saw their daughters demonstrating for abortion rights.
Between the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and various court decisions, it seemed as if the government, the courts and their own families all agreed: The traditional male-headed family was an anachronism.
How Many Laws?
But, the author concludes, breadwinning men weren't disappearing; they and their female supporters were just changing political parties. For many lower-middle-class women serving coffee to bosses and stocking grocery shelves, full-time motherhood wasn't the concentration camp described by feminists. They found a voice in antifeminists like Phyllis Schlafly, who almost single-handedly stopped the Equal Rights Amendment in the late s.
Catholic women and men organized groups to oppose abortion and were soon joined by evangelicals. Other grass-root groups emerged, some in support of Vietnam veterans and others celebrating what came to be known as family values. Add to List. Add to Registry. Award-winning historian Self is the first to recognize that the many separate threads of a great political realignment--from civil rights to women's rights, from the antiwar movement to the silent majority, from the abortion wars to gay marriage, from health care to welfare reform--all run through the politicized modern American family.
About This Item We aim to show you accurate product information. Manufacturers, suppliers and others provide what you see here, and we have not verified it. See our disclaimer. Specifications Publisher Farrar, Straus and Giroux.